Sphingobacterium phlebotomi sp. nov., a new member of family Sphingobacteriaceae isolated from sand fly rearing substrate
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, May 2021
Madhavi L. Kakumanu, Bahjat Fadi Marayati, Ayako Wada-Katsumata, Gideon Wasserberg, Coby Schal, Charles S. Apperson, Loganathan Ponnusamy
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||67%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||33%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||33%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||33%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
of 8,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 439,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.